Deborah Aturu is a writer based in Lagos. She's interested in all things Project Management, technology, and photography related, and sleeps as much as she reads.


Follow her [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/brownnboredd).


Deborah Aturu

Emmanuel Daniji is a Lagos-based Journalist, Writer, media personnel, and publicist. He's interested in all things Project Management, technology, and startups.


Follow him [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/iam_bigdan).


Emmanuel Daniji

Innocent is a writer based in Lagos City. He's interested in all things tech, science, and photography related, and likes to swim in his free time.


Follow him [on Twitter](https://twitter.com/centamadi).

Innocent Amadi



In today's ever-evolving landscape of human resources, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has become a topic of significant discussion. While AI presents opportunities for streamlining processes and enhancing efficiency, it also raises concerns about maintaining the human element in people management. At the heart of this debate lies the question: should we embrace AI or uphold the traditional role of human resources (HR)?

Let's take a deeper look into the considerations and implications of integrating AI into HR, drawing from recent discussions at the Drogo Performance Management Seminar.

## Understanding the Limitations of AI
AI holds immense potential in HR by automating tasks such as resume screening, candidate identification, and data analysis. This automation can undoubtedly expedite processes and reduce the burden on HR professionals. However, AI has its limitations. It cannot replicate the human capacity for building relationships, providing emotional support, or making nuanced decisions based on empathy and understanding.

Consider the example of personal requests from employees, such as time off for significant events. An automated system may deny such requests without considering individual circumstances, potentially leading to employee dissatisfaction and attrition. Therefore, while AI offers efficiency, it cannot replace the unique skills and expertise of HR professionals in addressing human needs.

## Striking the Right Balance
To harness the benefits of AI while preserving the human touch in HR, organizations must adopt a balanced approach:

### 1. **Focus on Augmentation**

Augmentation involves leveraging AI to enhance the capabilities of HR professionals rather than replacing them entirely. This approach recognizes that while AI can automate certain tasks and processes, it cannot replicate the human qualities essential for effective people management.

* **Task Automation:** AI can be employed to automate repetitive tasks such as resume screening, scheduling interviews, and data entry. By offloading these routine tasks to AI systems, HR professionals can allocate more time to strategic initiatives and high-value activities.
* **Data Analysis:** AI-driven analytics tools can analyze large datasets to identify trends, patterns, and insights relevant to HR decision-making. This enables HR professionals to make data-driven decisions regarding recruitment, retention, performance management, and employee engagement.
* **Strategic Planning:** With AI handling mundane tasks and providing valuable insights, HR professionals can focus on strategic planning initiatives. They can develop long-term talent acquisition strategies, succession plans, and training programs aligned with organizational goals.

By embracing augmentation, organizations empower HR professionals to leverage AI as a supportive tool, allowing them to concentrate on tasks that require human expertise, creativity, and empathy.

### 2. **Ethical AI Implementation**

Implementing AI ethically in HR processes is crucial to ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Ethical considerations should guide every stage of AI implementation, from data collection and algorithm development to decision-making and evaluation.

* **Fairness:** AI algorithms must be designed and trained to mitigate biases and ensure fair treatment of all individuals. This involves assessing and addressing biases present in training data, algorithms, and decision-making processes to prevent discriminatory outcomes.
* **Transparency:** Organizations should strive for transparency in AI-driven HR processes by providing clear explanations of how AI systems operate and the factors influencing their decisions. Employees should understand how AI is used in HR and have access to information regarding its implementation and impact.
* **Bias Mitigation:** Regular audits and checks should be conducted to identify and mitigate biases in AI systems. This may involve monitoring outcomes, evaluating algorithmic performance, and adjusting models or processes to minimize biases and ensure equitable treatment.
By prioritizing ethical AI implementation, organizations build trust among employees, mitigate risks associated with biased decision-making, and uphold principles of fairness and accountability in HR practices.

### 3. Continuous Learning

Continuous learning is essential for HR professionals to adapt to the evolving landscape of AI-driven HR practices. Organizations should provide training and development opportunities to equip HR professionals with the knowledge and skills needed to effectively leverage AI tools.

* **AI Literacy:** HR professionals should undergo training to develop a comprehensive understanding of AI concepts, technologies, and applications relevant to HR. This includes learning about AI algorithms, data analytics, machine learning, and their implications for HR practices.
* **Interpretation of AI Insights:** HR professionals should be able to interpret insights generated by AI systems and translate them into actionable strategies and decisions. This requires critical thinking skills, domain expertise, and the ability to contextualize AI-generated insights within the broader organizational context.
* **Collaboration with Data Scientists:** Collaboration between HR professionals and data scientists can enhance AI capabilities in HR. HR professionals can collaborate with data scientists to develop AI models, interpret results, and integrate AI-driven insights into HR processes effectively.

By investing in continuous learning initiatives, organizations empower HR professionals to leverage AI effectively, make informed decisions, and adapt to the changing demands of the digital age.

### 4. Human-Centric Approach:

A human-centric approach to HR recognizes the importance of maintaining human interaction, empathy, and personalized support in people management processes, despite the integration of AI technologies.

* **Open Communication:** HR professionals should foster open communication with employees to understand their needs, concerns, and aspirations. This involves actively listening to employee feedback, soliciting input on HR initiatives, and providing channels for dialogue and collaboration.
* **Empathy and Understanding:** HR professionals should demonstrate empathy and understanding when addressing employee issues and challenges. This includes recognizing the unique circumstances and emotions involved in personal requests, conflicts, and performance issues and providing support and guidance accordingly.
* **Personalized Support:** HR professionals should offer personalized support to employees based on their individual needs and preferences. This may involve tailoring HR policies, programs, and initiatives to accommodate diverse backgrounds, preferences, and circumstances.

By maintaining a human-centric approach, organizations create a supportive and inclusive work environment where employees feel valued, respected, and cared for, enhancing morale, engagement, and retention.

Integrating AI into HR requires a delicate balance between efficiency and human-centered care. By augmenting HR capabilities, implementing AI ethically, fostering continuous learning, and maintaining a human-centric approach, organizations can create an HR ecosystem that empowers employees while leveraging technological advancements.

> At the Drogo Performance Management Seminar, guests expressed varied preferences for AI or HR, reflecting the diverse perspectives on this issue. Ultimately, successful HR practices in the digital age will combine the strengths of AI-driven efficiency with the human touch, paving the way for a prosperous future in people management. Choosing the right tool to help with HR is important. DrogoAI is a great choice because it helps HR people do their job better. It uses AI to make things easier and faster, but it still keeps the human touch. DrogoAI is special because it cares about fairness and being honest. It also helps HR people learn new things so they can do their job even better. With DrogoAI, companies can make their employees feel valued and happy. So, if you want to make HR better, choose DrogoAI. It's the smart choice for a kinder, more efficient workplace.



While AI presents opportunities for streamlining processes and enhancing efficiency, it also raises concerns about maintaining the human element in people management. "This article takes a deeper look into the considerations and implications of integrating AI into HR, drawing from discussions at one of the Drogo Performance Management Seminar."

Striking the Right Balance: Integrating AI and Human Touch in HR



In the dynamic landscape of project management, measuring team performance is vital for enhancing productivity, identifying bottlenecks, and fostering continuous improvement. With the proliferation of digital tools, such as Jira and Drogo, teams have powerful platforms at their disposal to streamline workflows and track progress. In this article, we take a closer look at the methodologies and functionalities of both Jira and Drogo concerning team performance measurement, highlighting their respective strengths and areas of application.

![Jira Board](https://res.cloudinary.com/hera-marketing/image/upload/v1715780246/drogo_images/bifz7fyhgihmmtz2svyc.png)

## Understanding Jira: The Agile Workhorse
Jira is a versatile project management tool widely adopted by agile teams for its robust features tailored to Agile methodologies. It offers a comprehensive suite of functionalities for planning, tracking, and releasing software. When it comes to measuring team performance, Jira provides several built-in metrics and reporting capabilities that enable teams to gain insights into their productivity and efficiency.

1. **Burndown Charts:** Burndown charts in Jira visually represent the progress of tasks over time, allowing teams to track whether they are on course to meet their sprint goals. By comparing planned work against completed work, teams can assess their performance and make necessary adjustments to optimize productivity.

2. **Velocity Tracking:** Velocity, a metric calculated based on the amount of work completed in each sprint, serves as a key indicator of team performance in Agile projects. Jira facilitates velocity tracking by automatically calculating and visualizing team velocity, enabling teams to forecast future iterations more accurately.

3. **Cumulative Flow Diagrams (CFD):** CFDs in Jira provide a holistic view of work in progress (WIP) across different stages of the workflow. By analyzing CFDs, teams can identify bottlenecks, monitor workflow efficiency, and make informed decisions to optimize their processes.

4. **Customizable Dashboards and Reports:** Jira allows teams to create customizable dashboards and reports tailored to their specific needs. Teams can track metrics such as cycle time, lead time, and issue resolution rate to evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement.

![Drogo Board](https://res.cloudinary.com/hera-marketing/image/upload/v1715780636/drogo_images/hpx5leniwb37wzcn0cpr.png)

## Exploring Drogo: A Unified Approach to Performance Measurement
Drogo, on the other hand, is an emerging player in the realm of project management, offering a unified platform that integrates project planning, collaboration, and performance measurement. Unlike Jira, Drogo adopts a more holistic approach to team performance measurement, encompassing not only task completion but also collaboration dynamics and team engagement.

1. **Collaboration Analytics:** Drogo leverages advanced analytics to assess collaboration dynamics within teams. By analyzing communication patterns, contribution levels, and social interactions, Drogo provides insights into team dynamics and identifies opportunities to enhance collaboration and communication.

2. **Task Efficiency Metrics:** In addition to tracking task completion metrics, Drogo measures task efficiency by analyzing factors such as task duration, resource allocation, and dependencies. By identifying inefficiencies and optimizing resource allocation, teams can improve their overall productivity and performance.

3. **Team Engagement Metrics:** Drogo goes beyond traditional performance metrics to evaluate team engagement and satisfaction. By monitoring indicators such as team morale, workload distribution, and feedback sentiment, Drogo helps teams foster a positive work environment and enhance employee satisfaction.

4. **Predictive Analytics:** Leveraging machine learning algorithms, Drogo offers predictive analytics capabilities to forecast project outcomes and identify potential risks. By analyzing historical data and project trends, Drogo helps teams anticipate challenges and make proactive decisions to mitigate risks.

## Jira vs. Drogo: Choosing the Right Tool for Your Team

Both Jira and Drogo offer powerful features for measuring team performance, each with its own strengths and use cases. While Jira excels in Agile project management and provides extensive metrics for tracking task completion and sprint performance, Drogo takes a more holistic approach by integrating collaboration analytics, task efficiency metrics, and predictive analytics to provide a comprehensive view of team performance.

When choosing between Jira and Drogo, teams should consider their specific requirements, project methodologies, and organizational objectives. For teams focused on Agile development and software engineering, Jira may be the preferred choice due to its robust Agile features and seamless integration with development tools. On the other hand, teams looking for a unified platform that integrates project planning, collaboration, and performance measurement may find Drogo to be a more suitable solution.

> In conclusion, both Jira and Drogo offer valuable capabilities for measuring team performance, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the unique needs and preferences of each team.



In this article, we take a closer look at the methodologies and functionalities of both Jira and Drogo concerning team performance measurement, highlighting their respective strengths and areas of application.

Team performance

Striking the Right Balance: Integrating AI and Human Touch in HR

Navigating Team Performance Measurement: Jira vs. Drogo